ay and in what sense they say it.
Those who posit numbers only, and these mathematical, must be considered later; but as regards those who believe in the Ideas one might survey at the same time their way of thinking and the difficulty into which they fall. For they at the same time make the Ideas universal and again treat them as separable and as individuals. That this is not Paul Pogba Pelipaidat possible has been argued before. The reason why those who described their substances as universal combined these two characteristics in one thing, is that they did not make substances identical with sensible things. They thought that the particulars in the sensible world were a state of flux and none of them remained, but that the universal was apart from Tyskland Børn these and something different. And Socrates gave the impulse to Montreal Canadiens Barn this theory, as we said in our earlier discussion, by reason of his definitions, but he did not separate universals from Zambia Pelipaita individuals; and in this he thought rightly, in not separating them. This is plain from the results; for without the universal it is not possible to get knowledge, but the separation is the cause of the objections that arise with regard to the Ideas. His successors, however, treating it as necessary, if there are to be any substances besides the sensible and transient substances, that they must be separable, had no others, but gave separate existence to these universally predicated substances, so that it followed that universals and individuals were almost the same sort of thing. This in itself, then, would be one difficulty in the view we have mentioned.
Book XIII Chapter 10
Let us now mention a point which presents a certain difficulty both to those who believe in the Ideas and to those who do not, and which was stated before, at the beginning, among the problems. If we do not suppose substances to be separate, and in the way in which individual things are said to be separate, we shall destroy substance in the sense in which Riccardo Saponara Jersey we understand ‘substance’; but if we conceive substances to be separable, how are we to conceive their elements and their principles?
If they are individual Nike Free Run 5.0 and not universal, (a) real things Enzo Perez Jersey will be just of the same number as the elements, and (b) the elements will not be knowable. For (a) let the syllables in speech be substances, and their elements elements of substances; then there must be only one ‘ba’ and one of each of the syllables, since they are not universal and the same in form but each is one in number and a ‘this’ and not a kind possessed of a common name (and again they suppose that the ‘just what a thing is’ is in each case one). And if the syllables are unique, so too are NMD Runner the parts of which they consist; there will not, Holland Fodboldtrøjer then, be more a’s than one, nor more than one of any of the other elements, on the same principle on Ruotsi which an identical syllable cannot exist in the plural number. But if this is so, there will not be Tommaso Berni Jersey other things existing besides the Celtic Børn Fodboldtrøjer elements, but only the elements.
(b) Again, the elements will not be even knowable; for they arelinks:
http://snowstorm.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/site.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www.northhills-sp.com/store/cgi-bin/cp-app.cgi |
