ning with one another, and indeed with ourselves, has been annihilated; for it is impossible to think of anything if we do not think of one thing; but if this is possible,Moncler Tatie, one name might be assigned to this thing.)
Let it be assumed then, as was said at the beginning,Belstaff Nové Albatross Bunda, that the name has a meaning and has one meaning; it is impossible,Arturo Vidal Drakt, then, that ‘being a man’ should mean precisely ‘not being a man’,Canada Goose Expedition Parka, if ‘man’ not only signifies something about one subject but also has one significance (for we do not identify ‘having one significance’ with ‘signifying something about one subject’, since on that assumption even ‘musical’ and ‘white’ and ‘man’ would have had one significance, so that all things would have been one; for they would all have had the same significance).
And it will not be possible to be and not to be the same thing, except in virtue of an ambiguity, just as if one whom we call ‘man’,Canada Goose Victoria Parka, others were to call ‘not-man’; but the point in question is not this,Indiana Pacers Drakter, whether the same thing can at the same time be and not be a man in name, but whether it can in fact. Now if ‘man’ and ‘not-man’ mean nothing different, obviously ‘not being a man’ will mean nothing different from ‘being a man’; so that ‘being a man’ will be ‘not being a man’; for they will be one. For being one means this-being related as ‘raiment’ and ‘dress’ are, if their definition is one. And if ‘being a man’ and ‘being a not-man’ are to be one, they must mean one thing. But it was shown earlier’ that they mean different things.-Therefore,Kobe Bryant Drakter, if it is true to say of anything that it is a man, it must be a two-footed animal (for this was what ‘man’ meant); and if this is necessary, it is impossible that the same thing should not at that time be a two-footed animal; for this is what ‘being necessary’ means-that it is impossible for the thing not to be. It is, then, impossible that it should be at the same time true to say the same thing is a man and is not a man.
The same account holds good with regard to ‘not being a man’, for ‘being a man’ and ‘being a not-man’ mean different things, since even ‘being white’ and ‘being a man’ are different; for the former terms are much more different so that they must a fortiori mean different things. And if any one says that ‘white’ means one and the same thing as ‘man’, again we shall say the same as what was said before,Kanadanhanhi Miehet Cg Constable Parka, that it would follow that all things are one, and not only opposites. But if this is impossible,Norwich City Drakt, then what we have maintained will follow, if our opponent will only answer our question.
And if,Luxury Boulder, when one asks the question simply, he adds the contradictories,Moncler Bulgarie, he is not answering the question. For there is nothing to prevent the same thing from being both a man and white and countless other things: but still, if one asks whether it is or is not true to say that this is a man, our opponent must give an answer which means one thing,Ženy Barbour Waxed Bunda, and not add that ‘it is also white and large’.
相关的主题文章：
http://www.jrpf.gov.cn/Review.asp?NewsID=1818
http://www.olginfo.com/discuz/viewthread.php?tid=438184&pid=518361&page=1&extra=page%3D1#pid518361
http://www.e-anim.com/test/E_GuestBook.asp |
