g’ that which can build, and Chelsea Dresy by ‘capable of seeing’ that which can see, and by ‘visible’ that which can be seen. And the same account applies to all other cases, so that the formula and the knowledge of the one must precede the knowledge of the other.
(2) In time it is prior in this sense: the actual which is identical in species though not in number with a potentially POLO Borussia Dortmund existing thing is to it. I mean that to this particular man who now exists actually and to the corn and to New York City Dresy the seeing subject the matter and the seed Švédsko Dres Děti and that which is capable of seeing, which are potentially a Maillot Corinthians man and corn and seeing, but not yet actually so, are prior in time; but prior in time to these are other actually existing things, from QPR Errea Dresy which they were produced. For from the potentially existing the actually existing is always produced by an actually existing thing, e.g. man from man, musician by musician; there is always a first mover, and Maillot Croatie Enfant the mover already exists actually. We have said in our account of substance that everything that is produced is something produced from something and by something, and that the same in species as it.
This is why it is thought impossible to be a builder if one has built nothing or a harper if one has never played the harp; for he who learns to play the harp learns to play it by playing it, and all other learners do similarly. And thence arose the sophistical quibble, that one POLO Inter Milan who does not possess a science Maillot Suisse will be doing that which is the object of the science; for he who is learning it does not possess it. But since, of that which is coming to be, some part must have come to be, and, of that which, in general, is changing, some part must have changed (this is shown in the treatise on movement), he who is learning must, it would seem, possess some part of the science. But here too, then, it is clear that actuality is in this sense also, viz. in order of generation and of time, prior to potency.
But (3) it is also prior in substantiality; firstly, (a) because the things that are posterior in becoming are prior in form and in substantiality (e.g. man is prior to boy and human being to seed; for the one already has its form, and the other has not), and because everything that comes to be moves towards a principle, i.e. an end (for that for the sake of which a thing is, is its principle, and the becoming is for the sake of the end), and the actuality is the end, and it is for the sake of this that the potency is acquired. For animals do not see in order that they may have sight, but they have sight that they may see. And similarly men have the art of building that Tim Horton Tröja they may build, and theoretical science that they may theorize; but they do not theorize that they may Nizozemí Dresy have theoretical science, except those who are learning by practice; and these do not theorize except in a limited sense, or because they have no need to theorize. Further, matter exists in a potential state, just Brendan Gallagher Tröja because it may come to its form; and when it exists actually, then it is in its form. And the same holds good in all caselinks:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www.radiologycases.com/casereports/jrcr-mcq.cgi |
