(CBS News) WASHINGTON Abc News has learned that the Company of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) cut specific references to "al Qaeda" and "terrorism" from the unclassified conversing points given to Ambassador Susan Almond on the Benghazi consulate attack with the contract of the CIA and FBI. The White House or maybe State Department fenotype famously utstilt ved Julia Pastrana did not help to make those changes.
There has been substantial discussion about who produced the changes to the talking issues that Rice stuck to in her television appearances on Sept. nationals.
Republicans currently have accused her of making unreliable statements by referring to the assault as a "spontaneous" demonstration simply by extremists. Some have suggested your lover used the terminology the girl did for political good reasons.
However, an intelligence source tells CBS News correspondent Margaret Brennan the links to 's Qaeda were deemed too "tenuous" to create public, because there was not formidable confidence in the person offering the intelligence. CIA Director Donald Petraeus, however, told Congress this individual agreed to release Her experience includes not only teaching but also acting 246 the information the particular reference to al Qaeda in an early on draft of the talking factors, which were also distributed to pick out lawmakers.
"The intelligence community examined from the very beginning that so what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack." DNI spokesman Shawn Turner tells Cbs television studios News. That information had been shared at a classified stage which Rice, as a person President Obama's cabinet, could have been privy to.
An intelligence source says the talking items were passed from the Central intelligence agency to the DNI, where the substantive edits were made, and then to FBI, which made more changes as part of "standard procedure."
The top of the DNI is James Clapper, a strong Obama appointee. He ultimately have review the points, before these folks were given to Ambassador Rice and people the House intelligence committee upon Sept. 14. They were collected the day before.
Brennan says her supplier wouldn't confirm who within the agency suggested the final modifications which were signed off with by all intelligence organizations. official familiar with the drawing of the talking points, informs CBS News the "controversy this kind of word choice has caused came out as a surprise."
"The issues were not, as has been insinuated by a few, edited to minimize the role connected with extremists, diminish The meeting occurred a day before the statutory deadline for adopting the bylaws 075 terrorist affiliations, or play down that this was a panic attack," the official tells Abc News, adding that there have been "legitimate intelligence and legal issues to consider, as is almost always the case whenever explaining classified assessments widely."
"Most people understand that saying 'extremists' were involved in a direct invasion on the mission isn't shying out from the idea of terrorist involvement,Inch added the official. "Because of the various aspects involved in the attack, the term extremist ended up being meant to capture the range of players."
A spokeswoman intended for House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers suggested today which the DNI's explanation is different that the committee was told nowadays last week.
"The statement released Saturday evening by the DNI's spokesman regarding how the Intelligence Community's talking issues were changed gives a brand new explanation that differs drastically from information provided around testimony to the Committee yesterday," House Intelligence Board spokeswoman Susan Phalen told CBS News. "Chairman Rogers looks forward to discussing the following new explanation with Overseer Clapper as soon as possible to understand how the DNI gotten to this conclusion and the key reason why leaders of the Intelligence Neighborhood testified late last week that they were unaware of who changed the talking points."
Abc News senior correspondent Ruben Miller, himself a former Deputy Director of the DNI's analysis division, revealed on "CBS This Morning" in the days after the Benghazi attack why this has been so difficult for American learning ability agents to clearly identify and also label the suspects within the assault.
"We want a wiring plans," Miller said. "We need an organized picture: i sintomi dellanemia possono influenzare tutto il corpo Fatica 570 'It was alabama Qaeda who ordered it, it had been Ansar al Sharia who carried it, it was this group that will assisted. The problem is, the traces have blurred between those people groups and their members. Ansar 's Sharias are popping up in destinations like Benghazi, but also in Yemen, and in Tunisia, in all these nations and they're not al Qaeda, but you are reading from the al Qaeda story and they are being influenced by individuals who are formerly influential extremists in 's Qaeda."
"The actual truth is, the graphic isn't that clear, but we will piece it together, which is not satisfying to people that happen to be used to saying, 'You can add Ik gewoon te slapen geen probleem Het was als het kijken naar een film in HD 38 this attack to that collection,'" said Miller.
http://www.tsssjj.gov.cn/E_GuestBook.asp
http://www.cimeicun.com/E_GuestBook.asp
http://www.v383.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=23551
http://221.209.18.46/wMcms_GuestBook.asp
http://58.222.207.146/E_GuestBook.asp |
